Purvi Mukesh Gada v. Mukesh Popatlal Gada

What the court was looking at

By the date of the petition the marriage was 12 years old. There was one child, so child maintenance sat alongside the wife's own claim. The ground pleaded was cruelty. The wife was described as businessman (assets over rs 1083 crore).

What makes it worth reading

Maintenance enhanced 7 times from Rs 50000 to Rs 350000/month; husband's assets worth over Rs 1083 crores based on ready reckoner rates; false plea of no means; decided November 2025.

How it fits the framework

Since Rajnesh v. Neha in 2020, every maintenance order in India is meant to work through the same list of factors: the standard of living the marriage ran at, what the applicant reasonably needs, whether she is qualified and earning, and whether she gave up work for the family. A judgement from 2025 was decided before that list was written down, but the reasoning behind it is the reasoning courts had been applying for decades. There is a fuller account in how maintenance is calculated.

Judgements near this one

Ranked by court, then by income bracket and marriage length rather than by date, so the comparison is with cases a court would actually treat as similar. Every row links to its own page.