Jharkhand High Court · 2025
Jharkhand HC Autistic Child JP Morgan 2025
In 2025 the Jharkhand High Court ordered maintenance of Rs 50,000 a month in Jharkhand HC Autistic Child JP Morgan 2025, against a declared income of Rs 23.13 lakh a month.
Courts start from the same handful of numbers every time. Put yours in and see the range.
Calculate your maintenance →Awarded
Rs 50,000a month
Award type
Monthly, stepped up over time
Child maintenance
Rs 40,000a month
Husband's income
Rs 23,12,940
Children
1
Outcome
Enhanced on appeal
What the court was looking at
There was one child, so child maintenance sat alongside the wife's own claim. The husband was described as it professional (jp morgan) and the wife as homemaker.
The point of interest
Jharkhand HC enhanced maintenance to Rs 50000/month for wife + Rs 40000/month for autistic son (total Rs 90000/month) with 5% enhancement every 2 years from July 2025; husband earns Rs 2,31,294/month at JP Morgan Mumbai; autism is incurable requiring huge regular expenditure; RTI revealed husband's income.
How it fits the framework
Since Rajnesh v. Neha in 2020, every maintenance order in India is meant to work through the same list of factors: the standard of living the marriage ran at, what the applicant reasonably needs, whether she is qualified and earning, and whether she gave up work for the family. A judgement from 2025 was decided before that list was written down, but the reasoning behind it is the reasoning courts had been applying for decades. There is a fuller account in how maintenance is calculated.
The calculator walks the same factors a magistrate does, then shows you the judgements nearest your facts.
See your estimate →Judgements near this one
Ranked by court, then by income bracket and marriage length rather than by date, so the comparison is with cases a court would actually treat as similar. Every row links to its own page.
| Case | Court | Year | Awarded | Claimed under | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jharkhand HC Live-in Concealment Case | Jharkhand High Court | 2025 | Rs 5,00,00,000 | Section 12 HMA | Granted |
| Manoj Kumar v. Sushma Dey | Jharkhand High Court | 2025 | Rs 60,000 | Section 25 HMA | Granted |
| Vandana Kumari v. Greesh Babu Mathur | Jharkhand High Court | 2025 | Rs 4,00,00,000 | Section 25 HMA | Granted |
| Alok Kumar v. Anupama Singh (Patna HC) | Patna High Court | 2025 | Rs 90,00,000 | Section 25 HMA | Granted |
| Kiran Jyot Maini v. Anish Pramod Patel | Supreme Court of India | 2024 | Rs 2,00,00,000 | Article 142 | Granted |
Sources
- unreported
- Full text of the judgement on IndianKanoon.
- Inflation adjustment method: how we restate old awards.
This page summarises a reported judgement for general information. It is not legal advice and it is not a substitute for reading the judgement itself or speaking to a lawyer about your own facts.
Every judgement here went into the estimator. Ninety seconds, no sign-up.
Calculate your maintenance →