Patna High Court · 2025
Alok Kumar v. Anupama Singh (Patna HC)
In 2025 the Patna High Court ordered maintenance of Rs 90 lakh as a one-time settlement in Alok Kumar v. Anupama Singh (Patna HC), against a declared income of Rs 6 lakh a month.
Courts start from the same handful of numbers every time. Put yours in and see the range.
Calculate your maintenance →Awarded
Rs 90,00,000as a one-time settlement
Award type
One-time settlement
Husband's income
Rs 6,00,000
Marriage lasted
15 years
Children
None
Claimed under
Outcome
Granted
What the court was looking at
The marriage had run 15 years by the time it reached court, which puts it in the 7 to 15 years bracket. There were no children, which removes the largest single variable from the arithmetic. The husband was described as merchant navy master.
What makes it worth reading
Duty to ensure wife doesn't live in penury.
How it fits the framework
Since Rajnesh v. Neha in 2020, every maintenance order in India is meant to work through the same list of factors: the standard of living the marriage ran at, what the applicant reasonably needs, whether she is qualified and earning, and whether she gave up work for the family. A judgement from 2025 was decided before that list was written down, but the reasoning behind it is the reasoning courts had been applying for decades. There is a fuller account in how maintenance is calculated.
The calculator walks the same factors a magistrate does, then shows you the judgements nearest your facts.
See your estimate →Judgements near this one
Ranked by court, then by income bracket and marriage length rather than by date, so the comparison is with cases a court would actually treat as similar. Every row links to its own page.
| Case | Court | Year | Awarded | Claimed under | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiran Jyot Maini v. Anish Pramod Patel | Supreme Court of India | 2024 | Rs 2,00,00,000 | Article 142 | Granted |
| Ravi Prakash Saxena v. Priyanka Rani | Patna High Court | 2025 | Rs 0 | Not recorded | |
| A. Ranjithkumar v. E. Kavitha | Supreme Court of India | 2025 | Rs 1,25,00,000 | Article 142 | Granted |
| Jharkhand HC Autistic Child JP Morgan 2025 | Jharkhand High Court | 2025 | Rs 50,000 | Not recorded | Enhanced on appeal |
| Jharkhand HC Live-in Concealment Case | Jharkhand High Court | 2025 | Rs 5,00,00,000 | Section 12 HMA | Granted |
Sources
- Full text of the judgement on IndianKanoon.
- Inflation adjustment method: how we restate old awards.
This page summarises a reported judgement for general information. It is not legal advice and it is not a substitute for reading the judgement itself or speaking to a lawyer about your own facts.
Every judgement here went into the estimator. Ninety seconds, no sign-up.
Calculate your maintenance →